Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey
2012 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez (1693)
- Black
- Capucine Saucey (1849)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez (1693) and Capucine Saucey (1849) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez games or Capucine Saucey games? This Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey?
Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Gonzalez Fernandez vs Capucine Saucey, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.