David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo
3. Guimaraes Chess Open, 2019 · Result 1–0 · French Defense (C00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Gomez Peco (2104)
- Black
- Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo (1819)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Guimaraes Chess Open
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- French Defense (C00)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Gomez Peco (2104) and Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo (1819) was played at 3. Guimaraes Chess Open in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense (C00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Gomez Peco games or Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo games? This David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo?
David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo (2019) finished 1–0, a win for David Gomez Peco.
What opening was played in David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo?
The game opened with the French Defense (ECO C00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Gomez Peco vs Francisco Joao Guimaraes Araujo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.