Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres
2016 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense (A84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales (1729)
- Black
- Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres (1957)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense (A84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales (1729) and Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres (1957) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense (A84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales games or Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres games? This Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres?
Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres.
What opening was played in Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense (ECO A84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Sebastian Gomez Morales vs Brayan Daniel Bejar Caceres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.