Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao
INDIVIDUAL, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal (2335)
- Black
- A Lostao
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- INDIVIDUAL
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal (2335) and A Lostao was played at INDIVIDUAL and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal games or A Lostao games? This Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao?
Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao finished 1–0, a win for Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal.
What opening was played in Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs A Lostao, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.