Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez
2009 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal (2371)
- Black
- Jose Luis Gil Martinez (1989)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal (2371) and Jose Luis Gil Martinez (1989) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal games or Jose Luis Gil Martinez games? This Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez?
Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Felix Manuel Gomez Fontal vs Jose Luis Gil Martinez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.