Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano
2018 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pedro Pessoa Gomes (1571)
- Black
- Alexandre Pinto Romano (2065)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pedro Pessoa Gomes (1571) and Alexandre Pinto Romano (2065) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pedro Pessoa Gomes games or Alexandre Pinto Romano games? This Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano?
Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pedro Pessoa Gomes vs Alexandre Pinto Romano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.