Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso
MT-Roze (LAT), 2018 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Golubenko (2133)
- Black
- Antonio Conde Poderoso (2371)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- MT-Roze (LAT)
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Golubenko (2133) and Antonio Conde Poderoso (2371) was played at MT-Roze (LAT) in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Golubenko games or Antonio Conde Poderoso games? This Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso?
Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Conde Poderoso.
What opening was played in Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Golubenko vs Antonio Conde Poderoso, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.