Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Artiom Golovchanov (2114)
- Black
- Viktor Korotchenkov (1675)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Artiom Golovchanov (2114) and Viktor Korotchenkov (1675) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Artiom Golovchanov games or Viktor Korotchenkov games? This Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov?
Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov finished 1–0, a win for Artiom Golovchanov.
What opening was played in Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Artiom Golovchanov vs Viktor Korotchenkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.