Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor
59. Rubinstein Mem Open, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Golecki (2162)
- Black
- Tomasz Bachor (2025)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 59. Rubinstein Mem Open
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Golecki (2162) and Tomasz Bachor (2025) was played at 59. Rubinstein Mem Open in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Golecki games or Tomasz Bachor games? This Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor?
Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Jan Golecki.
What opening was played in Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Golecki vs Tomasz Bachor, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.