Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre
2008 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gildas Goldsztejn (2374)
- Black
- Fabien Lavabre (2235)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gildas Goldsztejn (2374) and Fabien Lavabre (2235) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gildas Goldsztejn games or Fabien Lavabre games? This Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre?
Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Gildas Goldsztejn.
What opening was played in Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gildas Goldsztejn vs Fabien Lavabre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.