Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf
24. Schlosspark Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria (1971)
- Black
- Marco Rolf (1864)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 24. Schlosspark Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria (1971) and Marco Rolf (1864) was played at 24. Schlosspark Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria games or Marco Rolf games? This Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf?
Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Marco Rolf.
What opening was played in Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andreas Goldschmidt-Gaviria vs Marco Rolf, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.