Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov
St.Petersburg Summer Open, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksey Goganov (2586)
- Black
- Vsevolod Ovchinnikov (1252)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- St.Petersburg Summer Open
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksey Goganov (2586) and Vsevolod Ovchinnikov (1252) was played at St.Petersburg Summer Open in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksey Goganov games or Vsevolod Ovchinnikov games? This Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov?
Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksey Goganov.
What opening was played in Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksey Goganov vs Vsevolod Ovchinnikov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.