Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel
Willingen GER, Ch U25 2005, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Goelz (1898)
- Black
- Christian Kuehnel (2150)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Willingen GER, Ch U25 2005
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Goelz (1898) and Christian Kuehnel (2150) was played at Willingen GER, Ch U25 2005 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Goelz games or Christian Kuehnel games? This Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel?
Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Goelz.
What opening was played in Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Goelz vs Christian Kuehnel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.