Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen
2013 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Constantin Goebel (2236)
- Black
- Joachim, Dr. Sieglen (2258)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Constantin Goebel (2236) and Joachim, Dr. Sieglen (2258) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Constantin Goebel games or Joachim, Dr. Sieglen games? This Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen?
Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Constantin Goebel vs Joachim, Dr. Sieglen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.