Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov
VWC7/pr17, 2014 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Gnilka (2093)
- Black
- Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov (2251)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- VWC7/pr17
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Gnilka (2093) and Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov (2251) was played at VWC7/pr17 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Gnilka games or Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov games? This Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov?
Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Thomas Gnilka.
What opening was played in Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Gnilka vs Vladimir Nikolaevic Kirsanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.