Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov
Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikhail Glukhov (2161)
- Black
- Ivan Bocharov (2470)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikhail Glukhov (2161) and Ivan Bocharov (2470) was played at Berdsk RUS, City Ch 2011 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikhail Glukhov games or Ivan Bocharov games? This Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov?
Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Bocharov.
What opening was played in Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikhail Glukhov vs Ivan Bocharov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.