Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov
VWC8 /pr 26, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense (E12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans-Joachim Glatzel (1939)
- Black
- Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov (2220)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- VWC8 /pr 26
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense (E12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans-Joachim Glatzel (1939) and Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov (2220) was played at VWC8 /pr 26 in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense (E12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans-Joachim Glatzel games or Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov games? This Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov?
Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense (ECO E12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans-Joachim Glatzel vs Dmitry Alekseevich Kucherov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.