Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit
Corr W-26ch ct01, 2006 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Helmut Glaser (2474)
- Black
- Hans-Juergen Isigkeit (2441)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr W-26ch ct01
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Helmut Glaser (2474) and Hans-Juergen Isigkeit (2441) was played at Corr W-26ch ct01 in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Helmut Glaser games or Hans-Juergen Isigkeit games? This Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit?
Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Helmut Glaser vs Hans-Juergen Isigkeit, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.