Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale
4NCL Division 4 South, 2018 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samuel Gilmore (1478)
- Black
- George Neale (1668)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 4 South
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samuel Gilmore (1478) and George Neale (1668) was played at 4NCL Division 4 South in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (D56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samuel Gilmore games or George Neale games? This Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale?
Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense, Russian Variation (ECO D56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samuel Gilmore vs George Neale, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.