Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek
2010 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christophe Gillain (2122)
- Black
- Richard Polaczek (2373)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christophe Gillain (2122) and Richard Polaczek (2373) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christophe Gillain games or Richard Polaczek games? This Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek?
Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (ECO E52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christophe Gillain vs Richard Polaczek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.