Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen
SCO/L2/19 (SCO), 2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Campbell Gibbs (2132)
- Black
- Andrew N MacMillen (1529)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SCO/L2/19 (SCO)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Campbell Gibbs (2132) and Andrew N MacMillen (1529) was played at SCO/L2/19 (SCO) in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Campbell Gibbs games or Andrew N MacMillen games? This Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen?
Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Campbell Gibbs.
What opening was played in Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO B46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Campbell Gibbs vs Andrew N MacMillen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.