Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato
Open 150' Unita' d'Italia B, 2011 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Advance Variation (C02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Giacchino (1664)
- Black
- Piergiorgio D Amato (1855)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Open 150' Unita' d'Italia B
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Giacchino (1664) and Piergiorgio D Amato (1855) was played at Open 150' Unita' d'Italia B in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Advance Variation (C02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Giacchino games or Piergiorgio D Amato games? This Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato?
Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Piergiorgio D Amato.
What opening was played in Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato?
The game opened with the French Defense: Advance Variation (ECO C02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Giacchino vs Piergiorgio D Amato, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.