Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye
17. Asian Continental, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ehsan Ghaem Maghami (2537)
- Black
- Lik Zang Lye (2321)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. Asian Continental
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ehsan Ghaem Maghami (2537) and Lik Zang Lye (2321) was played at 17. Asian Continental in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ehsan Ghaem Maghami games or Lik Zang Lye games? This Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye?
Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Lik Zang Lye.
What opening was played in Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Lik Zang Lye, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.