Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava
ADCF Masters, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ehsan Ghaem Maghami (2544)
- Black
- Beglar Jobava (2334)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ADCF Masters
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ehsan Ghaem Maghami (2544) and Beglar Jobava (2334) was played at ADCF Masters in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ehsan Ghaem Maghami games or Beglar Jobava games? This Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava?
Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Ehsan Ghaem Maghami.
What opening was played in Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ehsan Ghaem Maghami vs Beglar Jobava, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.