Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori
Asian U16g, 2004 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Gevorgyan (2097)
- Black
- Mandana Teimoori
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Asian U16g
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Gevorgyan (2097) and Mandana Teimoori was played at Asian U16g in 2004 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (E68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Gevorgyan games or Mandana Teimoori games? This Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori?
Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori (2004) finished 1–0, a win for Ivan Gevorgyan.
What opening was played in Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Long Variation (ECO E68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Gevorgyan vs Mandana Teimoori, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.