Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen
NED/SC2014 (NED), 2014 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alan de Geus (2150)
- Black
- Peter Leijen (2125)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NED/SC2014 (NED)
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alan de Geus (2150) and Peter Leijen (2125) was played at NED/SC2014 (NED) in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alan de Geus games or Peter Leijen games? This Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen?
Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alan de Geus vs Peter Leijen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.