Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva
88. ch-St Petersburg W, 2020 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tatyana Getman (2271)
- Black
- Varvara Vorobieva (1949)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 88. ch-St Petersburg W
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tatyana Getman (2271) and Varvara Vorobieva (1949) was played at 88. ch-St Petersburg W in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tatyana Getman games or Varvara Vorobieva games? This Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva?
Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Tatyana Getman.
What opening was played in Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (ECO D18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tatyana Getman vs Varvara Vorobieva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.