Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs
LAT/C29-A (LAT), 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gunars Gertners (2295)
- Black
- Osvalds Macs (2158)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- LAT/C29-A (LAT)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gunars Gertners (2295) and Osvalds Macs (2158) was played at LAT/C29-A (LAT) in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (D28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gunars Gertners games or Osvalds Macs games? This Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs?
Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Gunars Gertners.
What opening was played in Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System (ECO D28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gunars Gertners vs Osvalds Macs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.