Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas
TCh-LTU 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sarunas Germanavicius (2335)
- Black
- Tautvydas Vedrickas (2392)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-LTU 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sarunas Germanavicius (2335) and Tautvydas Vedrickas (2392) was played at TCh-LTU 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sarunas Germanavicius games or Tautvydas Vedrickas games? This Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas?
Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Tautvydas Vedrickas.
What opening was played in Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sarunas Germanavicius vs Tautvydas Vedrickas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.