Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann
date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Felix Gerland (2240)
- Black
- Patrick Wesemann
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Felix Gerland (2240) and Patrick Wesemann was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Felix Gerland games or Patrick Wesemann games? This Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann?
Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (ECO A37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Felix Gerland vs Patrick Wesemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.