Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa
USSR, 1987 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natalia Gerasimova
- Black
- Konstantin Landa
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- USSR
- Year
- 1987
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natalia Gerasimova and Konstantin Landa was played at USSR in 1987 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natalia Gerasimova games or Konstantin Landa games? This Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa?
Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa (1987) finished 0–1, a win for Konstantin Landa.
What opening was played in Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (ECO E84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natalia Gerasimova vs Konstantin Landa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.