Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel
WS/MN/075, 2011 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Secondo Genga (1755)
- Black
- Corky Schakel (2315)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/MN/075
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Secondo Genga (1755) and Corky Schakel (2315) was played at WS/MN/075 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Secondo Genga games or Corky Schakel games? This Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel?
Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Secondo Genga.
What opening was played in Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Secondo Genga vs Corky Schakel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.