Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath
Niedersachsen Ch Seniors 34th, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense (E61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Siegfried Gelzenleichter (2218)
- Black
- Siegfried Kampfrath (1962)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Niedersachsen Ch Seniors 34th
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense (E61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Siegfried Gelzenleichter (2218) and Siegfried Kampfrath (1962) was played at Niedersachsen Ch Seniors 34th and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense (E61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Siegfried Gelzenleichter games or Siegfried Kampfrath games? This Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath?
Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath finished 1–0, a win for Siegfried Gelzenleichter.
What opening was played in Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense (ECO E61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Siegfried Gelzenleichter vs Siegfried Kampfrath, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.