Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno
3. Tras-os-Montes Open, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Max Gedajlovic (2316)
- Black
- Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2440)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Tras-os-Montes Open
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Max Gedajlovic (2316) and Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2440) was played at 3. Tras-os-Montes Open in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Max Gedajlovic games or Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno games? This Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno?
Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Max Gedajlovic.
What opening was played in Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Max Gedajlovic vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.