Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska
2016 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Pilnik Variation (C90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Veronika Gazikova (2207)
- Black
- Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska (1923)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Pilnik Variation (C90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Veronika Gazikova (2207) and Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska (1923) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Pilnik Variation (C90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Veronika Gazikova games or Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska games? This Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Pilnik Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska?
Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Veronika Gazikova.
What opening was played in Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Pilnik Variation (ECO C90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Veronika Gazikova vs Joanna Kaczmarska-Kedzierska, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.