Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia
2019 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandru-Catalin Gavris (1511)
- Black
- Alexandru Balaban-Voia (1891)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandru-Catalin Gavris (1511) and Alexandru Balaban-Voia (1891) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandru-Catalin Gavris games or Alexandru Balaban-Voia games? This Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia?
Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Alexandru Balaban-Voia.
What opening was played in Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO A50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandru-Catalin Gavris vs Alexandru Balaban-Voia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.