Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis
2019 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil (2001)
- Black
- Dimitrios Bozanis (1895)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil (2001) and Dimitrios Bozanis (1895) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil games or Dimitrios Bozanis games? This Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis?
Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Dimitrios Bozanis.
What opening was played in Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Odysseas-Panagiotis Gavriil vs Dimitrios Bozanis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.