Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura
Estadual Jaragua Ch 46th, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Charles Gauche (2310)
- Black
- Horacio Matsuura (2220)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Estadual Jaragua Ch 46th
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Charles Gauche (2310) and Horacio Matsuura (2220) was played at Estadual Jaragua Ch 46th and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (E75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Charles Gauche games or Horacio Matsuura games? This Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura?
Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura finished 1–0, a win for Charles Gauche.
What opening was played in Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Main Line (ECO E75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Charles Gauche vs Horacio Matsuura, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.