Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini
ITA/Jubilee50/C (ITA), 2020 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Gatto (1744)
- Black
- Giampaolo Perini (2195)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ITA/Jubilee50/C (ITA)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Gatto (1744) and Giampaolo Perini (2195) was played at ITA/Jubilee50/C (ITA) in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Gatto games or Giampaolo Perini games? This Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini?
Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Gatto vs Giampaolo Perini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.