Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber
Vorarlberg Ch, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus Gasser (2125)
- Black
- Mario Leitgeber (1986)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Vorarlberg Ch
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus Gasser (2125) and Mario Leitgeber (1986) was played at Vorarlberg Ch and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus Gasser games or Mario Leitgeber games? This Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber?
Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber finished 1–0, a win for Klaus Gasser.
What opening was played in Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus Gasser vs Mario Leitgeber, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.