Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva
2016 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samra Gasimova (1479)
- Black
- Margarita Zvereva (1890)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samra Gasimova (1479) and Margarita Zvereva (1890) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samra Gasimova games or Margarita Zvereva games? This Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva?
Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Margarita Zvereva.
What opening was played in Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (ECO D63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samra Gasimova vs Margarita Zvereva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.