Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson
AA/C13/pr/I, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp (1880)
- Black
- Simon W Jenkinson (2040)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- AA/C13/pr/I
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp (1880) and Simon W Jenkinson (2040) was played at AA/C13/pr/I in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp games or Simon W Jenkinson games? This Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson?
Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Simon W Jenkinson.
What opening was played in Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bernhardt Gunter Conraad Garlipp vs Simon W Jenkinson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.