Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso
2013 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Otto Dmitry Garkauskas (2076)
- Black
- Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso (1794)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Otto Dmitry Garkauskas (2076) and Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso (1794) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Otto Dmitry Garkauskas games or Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso games? This Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso?
Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Otto Dmitry Garkauskas.
What opening was played in Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (ECO A44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Otto Dmitry Garkauskas vs Julia Aguiar Vieira Cardoso, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.