Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont
CAN-op U2400, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Gardner (2164)
- Black
- Oscar Sprumont (1948)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CAN-op U2400
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Gardner (2164) and Oscar Sprumont (1948) was played at CAN-op U2400 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Gardner games or Oscar Sprumont games? This Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont?
Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Gardner.
What opening was played in Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (ECO D91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Gardner vs Oscar Sprumont, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.