Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo D Almada Gardim (1591)
- Black
- Roberto Carlos Calixto (1829)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo D Almada Gardim (1591) and Roberto Carlos Calixto (1829) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo D Almada Gardim games or Roberto Carlos Calixto games? This Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto?
Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo D Almada Gardim vs Roberto Carlos Calixto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.