Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gutierrez Luis Garcia and Velandia Dilson Romero was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gutierrez Luis Garcia games or Velandia Dilson Romero games? This Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero?
Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero finished 1–0, a win for Gutierrez Luis Garcia.
What opening was played in Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gutierrez Luis Garcia vs Velandia Dilson Romero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.