Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco
58. Capablanca Mem Open, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Pseudo Queen's Indian Defense (A47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Legna Garcia Terry (2016)
- Black
- Kebert Solares Orozco (2362)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 58. Capablanca Mem Open
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Pseudo Queen's Indian Defense (A47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Legna Garcia Terry (2016) and Kebert Solares Orozco (2362) was played at 58. Capablanca Mem Open in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Pseudo Queen's Indian Defense (A47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Legna Garcia Terry games or Kebert Solares Orozco games? This Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pseudo Queen's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco?
Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Kebert Solares Orozco.
What opening was played in Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco?
The game opened with the Pseudo Queen's Indian Defense (ECO A47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Legna Garcia Terry vs Kebert Solares Orozco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.