Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora
2016 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2463)
- Black
- Joel Fernando Lora (2228)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2463) and Joel Fernando Lora (2228) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Garcia Pantoja games or Joel Fernando Lora games? This Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora?
Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Joel Fernando Lora, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.