Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2410)
- Black
- Jose Luis Gil Suarez (2313)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2410) and Jose Luis Gil Suarez (2313) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Garcia Pantoja games or Jose Luis Gil Suarez games? This Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez?
Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Garcia Pantoja.
What opening was played in Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Garcia Pantoja vs Jose Luis Gil Suarez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.