Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente
2011 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Federico Garcia Lemos (1989)
- Black
- Hector Manuel Valente (1849)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Federico Garcia Lemos (1989) and Hector Manuel Valente (1849) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Federico Garcia Lemos games or Hector Manuel Valente games? This Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente?
Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Federico Garcia Lemos vs Hector Manuel Valente, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.